Last updated April 16, 2026

Dr. Jeannette Armstrong

Jeannette Armstrong, Associate Professor in Indigenous Studies, is Syilx Okanagan. As an award-winning writer and activist, novelist and poet she has always sought to change deeply biased misconceptions related to Indigenous people. She is the recipient of the George Woodcock Lifetime Achievement Award for Literature. Her research in Indigenous philosophies and Okanagan Syilx thought and environmental ethics coded into Syilx oral literatures has been recognized locally and globally. She collaborates with Salish speaking groups to re-establish Indigenous languages, historical relationships, food resource ceremonies through gatherings, trading and protections of water and land practices. She is a recipient of the Eco Trust USA Buffett Award in Indigenous Leadership and serves on Canada’s Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee of Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC).

Dan Benoit

Dan Benoit is a Manitoba Métis from the Red River Settlement area and a member of the Métis Nation. He has spent most of his life living near his ancestor's Red River Lot in St. Norbert Parish, at the family farm near Seven Sisters Falls, MB, and most recently in the small Metis Village of St. Laurent, MB.
Like many Métis, Dan has been raised in the traditions and culture of his People including their special relationship and stewardship with the land and water. Dan is a farmer, hunter, trapper and fisherman, and continues to exercise these traditions and pass them along to others. He believes it is essential to preserve traditional Métis culture and lifestyle while being in harmony with the land. Dan formerly operated his family's traditional, turn of the century Métis farm, with most of the buildings and equipment dating to pre-1900s. The animals and vegetable crops found on the farm are those that were found in the early Red River Settlement circa 1820s. He was also a member of the Métis Horticultural Heritage Society, and is keenly interested in preserving agricultural heritage species and biodiversity. Dan has more than 10 years post-secondary education and has various degrees, diplomas and certificates in Natural Resources Management, Ecology and water and wastewater management from University College of the North, Red River College, University of Ottawa, and the University of Manitoba. He has worked for both industry and all three levels of government in the natural resources and environment field. Dan has worked for Tolko Forest Industries, the Canadian Forest Service, Manitoba Conservation, and the Whitemouth River Conservation District, amongst others. Dan has also worked for the RCMP and the Canadian Forces as an Officer. In addition to his farm operation, he has 10 years of experience as a consultant to First Nations Bands and Northern Affairs Communities in Manitoba regarding community development, environment and hydro-electric generation issues, and has owned and operated an eco- and Aboriginal -tourism guiding business in Eastern and Northern Manitoba, and Northwestern Ontario.
Dan is a leader in the Metis Nation, both at a former political level (Vice Chair of the MMF Anola Metis Local), as well as formerly at the MMF, and was part of the Environment Committee of the MNC. Dan was manager for five years, in charge of the Agriculture, Environment, Hydro, and Natural Resources Portfolios at the Manitoba Métis Federation (MMF) supervising a multi-disciplinary province-wide team of fourteen staff, including helping create the MMF Metis Law of the Harvest. For the last 8 years, he has worked as an environmental scientist with the government.
Dan is intimately knowledgeable in many other facets of Métis cultural heritage and traditional knowledge relating to water and land issues. In fact, his community recognizes this, and the Métis National Council and the MMF have appointed him to various provincial, national and international forums to represent the Métis Nation's interests on environmental and Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge issues. Dan was formerly a member of the Manitoba East- Side Planning Initiative's Round Table, Co-Chair of the Manitoba Floodway Authority Community Outreach Panel, Environment Canada's Mining Sector Sustainability Table, Co-Chair of COSEWIC's ATK subcommittee, MNC National Research Strategy, MNC Environment Committee, MNC's CBD Canadian Delegate, MNC Post-Powley Multilateral Process and Mining Association of Canada's Towards Sustainable Mining (TSM) Community of Interest Panel, as well as Aquatic Habitat Canada. Mr. Benoit lives with his wife Beth, their son Fred and daughter Katie, between Winnipeg and the small Metis fishing village of St. Laurent, Manitoba on the south-east shore of Lake Manitoba.

Nathan Cardinal

Nathan Cardinal is Métis with roots in northern Alberta. As with many Métis, Nathan comes from a long line of people with strong relationships with the land and views his current work in conservation as a continued interpretation of those responsibilities. Nathan has a bachelor of science and a master of environmental studies, concentrating on Indigenous knowledge systems and species at risk. Nathan has worked for Parks Canada in various capacities since 2006, with the majority of his work focusing on supporting Indigenous leadership in conservation, including co-developing innovative restoration and conservation projects as well as supporting national policy programs. From 2020 to 2022, Nathan worked with the Nature Conservancy of Canada to help advance the organization’s strategic direction in building improved relationships with Indigenous nations and communities and supporting Indigenous-led conservation. Since 2004, Nathan has also supported COSEWIC with the preparation of different ATK-related studies and reports. Nathan has had the opportunity to work with First Nation, Métis and Inuit peoples, governments and organizations from coast to coast to coast at community, regional, or national scales. Nathan is a citizen of the Métis Nation of BC and participates as a member of MNBC's Environmental Advisory Committee.

Jason Dicker

Jason Dicker is an Inuk from Nain, Nunatsiavut. He is currently the Wildlife Manager for the Nunatsiavut Government. He works on various wildlife related files ranging from polar bear to caribou and to migratory birds. He sits on several committees across Canada also related to wildlife and Inuit governance.
In 2012, after completing a technical diploma in Northern Natural Resources at the College of the North Atlantic, Jason transferred to Memorial University, Grenfell Campus in Corner Brook, Newfoundland to complete his Bachelor of Arts degree in Environmental Studies and his Master of Arts in Environmental Policy. While working towards completion of his undergraduate degree, Jason began to focus his studies around his interest in wildlife management and wrote his capstone undergraduate paper on the caribou hunting ban in northern Labrador. Jason decided to continue this imperative topic at the graduate level where his research helped identify and better understood the impacts of the caribou hunting ban in the lives of Inuit in Nunatsiavut.
Jason graduated with his Masters degree with the help and advice from Dr. Stephen Decker. He completed his research in support of his thesis entitled “Using Integrated Resource Management and the Public Trust Doctrine to Examine Wildlife Management Practices in Northern Labrador: A case study on the George River Caribou Hunting Ban”.

Roger Gallant

Roger Gallant is a Mi'kmaq from western Newfoundland and is currently working as an environmental consultant. He has a M.Sc. in Environment and Management, a B.Sc. in Environmental Science and Biology, a Masters Certificate in Project Management, and a Bachelor of Education (Post-Secondary). During the past several years, Roger has conducted various research studies and traditional knowledge initiatives. He has been active in the conservation and recovery of species at risk in insular Newfoundland. Recent activities have focused on the monitoring of piping plover (Charadrius melodus melodus) and several other avian species at risk in western NL; determining banded killifish (Fundulus diaphanus) dispersal and habitat requirements in NL; monitoring American eel (Anguilla rostrata) migrations; documenting traditional eel harvest practices; and, preserving Mi'kmaq traditional knowledge on culturally important species.

Eliane Grant

Eliane Grant is an Eenou (Cree) from Waswanipi in Eeyou Istchee. She is a wildlife biologist and holds a master’s degree in ecology from the Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue (UQAT); she is the director of the Department of Natural Resources for the Cree First Nation of Waswanipi, a visiting professor at the School of Indigenous Studies, and the coordinator of the Certificate program in Land Management in Indigenous Context (UQAT). Her work and research focus on land disturbances affecting cultural practices and wildlife species of interest to the Eeyouch (Cree), with an emphasis on the link between traditional knowledge and science. She also carries out various wildlife and environmental projects and assists land users during government consultations.

Neil Jones

Neil Jones is Anishinaabe from Ketegaunseebee (Garden River First Nation, Ontario). He currently serves as the Environmental Stewardship Senior Policy Advisor at Robinson Huron Waawiindamaagewin, a treaty association representing 21 First Nations in and around the Lake Huron region.
Neil brings over 25 years of experience with Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), where he worked on environmental research and policy, including the Species at Risk Act (SARA), the Fisheries Act (FA), and areas related to Indigenous Knowledge, Relationship, Engagement, Consultation, and UNDRIP.
He is a member of the Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee of COSEWIC. His stewardship approaches reflect the teachings of the Knowledge Holders he’s been fortunate to know and work with, as well as the Dish with One Spoon and the two row wampum belts. Neil holds a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry and a Masters of Science in Biology.

Dr. Allyson Menzies

Allyson Menzies (she/her) was born and raised in Treaty 2 territory and is of Métis and settler ancestry. Her connection to land and wildlife was shaped through time spent on the prairies and continues to guide her work today. She now lives and works in Treaty 7 as an Assistant Professor at the University of Calgary. Her work focuses on community-based monitoring and the co-production of ecological knowledges to support the stewardship of culturally important species, including moose, geese, and bison, across central Canada. She works closely with Indigenous and non-academic partners to develop monitoring approaches and inform management decisions that are both scientifically rigorous and grounded in place, relationships, and local priorities. She approaches this work with a strong sense of responsibility to her own ancestors and to the Peoples whose lands she lives and works on, and whose relationships with these species long predate her own.

Appendix 3: Examples of ethics review resources

  • Guidelines for Scientific Activities in Northern Canada, DIAND, 1976
  • Ethical Principles for the conduct of research in the North, 1982
  • Dene Nation: participatory research process for Dene/Metis communities, 1993
  • ITK background paper on negotiating research relationships, 1994
  • Kahnawake Code of Research Ethics, 1997
  • James Bay Cree Board of H&SS, code of research ethics, 2001
  • Tri-Council Policy Statement (MRC, NSERC and SSHRC 1998)
  • Ethical Principles for the Conduct of Research in the North (ACUNS 1998)

Appendix 2: Examples of Aboriginal protocols resources

Alberta Traditional Knowledge Handbook

West Kitikmeot/Slave Study (WKSS)
A set of guidelines for researching Aboriginal Knowledge was developed by the study for these projects: Tuktu & Nogak Project, Caribou Migration and the State of their Habitat, The Habitat of Dogrib Traditional Territory: Place names as Indicators of Biogeographical Knowledge and TK Study on Community Health.

The Convention on Biological Diversity - source for multiple documents on guidelines and protocol development

Government of Northwest Territories (GNWT) Traditional Knowledge policy

Gwich'in Social and Cultural Institute (GSCI) - Gwich'in Traditional Knowledge Policy and Research Guidelines and a Research Agreement Framework

Building Relations with First Nations: A Handbook for Local Governments – by the Union of BC Municipalities and the Lower Mainland Treaty Advisory Committee (PDF)

Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (PDF)

Mackenzie Valley Impact Review Board (PDF)

Gwich'in Environmental Knowledge Project

The Inuit Bowhead Knowledge Study - by Nunavut Wildlife Management Board

Links to international sites for policy development (see Australia and New Zealand, etc.) – by the Panel on Research Ethics

Mi’kmaw Research Principles & Protocols – by the Mi'kmaq College Institute of Cape Breton University

Akwesasne Task Force on the Environment, (1996) . Protocol For Review of Environmental and Scientific Research Proposals

Protocols and Principles for Conducting Research in an Indigenous Context. University of Victoria, Faculty of Human and Social Development

Emery, A.R., 2000. Guidelines: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge in Project Planning and Implementation. Prepared by KIVU Inc. for the World Bank and the Canadian International Development Agency.

Management of Social Transformation Programme and Centre for International Research and Advisory Networks Best Practices on Indigenous Knowledge.

Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development and Industry Canada Intellectual Property and Aboriginal People: A Working Paper. (PDF)

Hansen, S.A. and J.W. Van Fleet, 2003. Traditional Knowledge and Intellectual Property: A Handbook on Issues and Options for Traditional Knowledge Holders in Protecting their Intellectual Property and Maintaining Biological Diversity. Prepared for the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Marles, R. J., C. Clavelle, L. Monteleone, N. Tays and D. Burns. 2000. Aboriginal Plant Use in Canada’s Northwest Boreal Forest. Natural Resources Canada. 368 pp.
Note: This is a book that summarizes the uses of plants in the Northwest; it is useful because it provides a detailed introduction on the collection of ATK (in the broader sense) from Aboriginal Groups and demonstrates one way to handle “verifiability” of the individuals that communicated the information.

BC Metis Assembly of Natural Resources. 2009. Metis Nation British Columbia Consultation Guidebook. (PDF)

Assembly of First Nations. 2007. OCAP - Ownership, Control, Access and Possession, First Nations Inherent Right to Govern First Nations data (PDF)

Assembly of First Nations. 2009. Environmental Stewardship Unit. Ethics in First Nations Research. (PDF)

Appendix 1: Acronyms and Glossary of terms used in these guidelines and in SARA

For the meanings of terms in this Appendix, refer to the section entitled definitions and abbreviations on the COSEWIC website.

  • Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Subcommittee
  • Area of Occupancy
  • Assessment Criteria
  • Best Available Information
  • Canadian Range of Occurrence
  • Canadian Wildlife Species at Risk
  • CDC: Conservation Data Centre
  • CESCC: The Canadian Endangered Species Conservation Council
  • CITES: The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species
  • COSEWIC: Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
  • COSEWIC Candidate List
  • CWDC: The Canadian Wildlife Directors Committee
  • CWS: Canadian Wildlife Service of Environment and Climate Change Canada.
  • Data Deficient (DD)
  • Designatable Unit (DU)
  • DFO: The federal Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
  • Endangered (E)
  • Extinct (X)
  • Extirpated (XT)
  • Genetically Modified Organisms
  • Imminent Extirpation or Extinction
  • IUCN: World Conservation Union (formerly known as the International Union for the Conservation of Nature)
  • Jurisdiction
  • Living Document
  • NACOSAR: The National Aboriginal Council on Species at Risk
  • Native Wildlife Species
  • Natural Range
  • Non-government Science Member
  • Not at Risk (NAR)
  • Population
  • Re-introduction
  • Special Concern (SC)
  • Species Specialist Subcommittee (SSC)
  • SSC Candidate List
  • Status Assessment:
  • Status Report
  • Threatened (T)
  • Wildlife Species

These guidelines were produced solely for use by Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC)

Approved by COSEWIC in November 2017

Preamble

When available, guidance on the process and protocols used to gather ATK from Aboriginal persons or communities will be provided by that community.

However, when such guidance is not established, the ATK Sub-Committee (ATK Subcommittee) of COSEWIC recommends the use of the COSEWIC ATK Process and Protocol Guidelines described herein.

Purpose of the COSEWIC ATK Process and Protocols Guidelines

These guidelines outline an approach as well as specific steps to facilitating access to and the gathering of the available Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge (ATK) as well as the integration of that knowledge into the COSEWIC species status assessment process. These guidelines are intended to be comprehensive such that they meet the requirements of diverse Aboriginal groups (cultures, organizations, councils, communities, TEK oversight committees, etc.).

Description of ATK: ATK is based on the knowledge of the relationships between humans, wildlife, spirituality, environmental conditions, and land forms in a defined locality and, frequently, over lengthy time periods. ATK is the term used by the COSEWIC ATK Subcommittee and others to describe the complex and unique knowledge and knowledge systems held by Aboriginal Peoples. Bringing together ATK and Western Science knowledge will benefit species by providing another perspective for COSEWIC’s wildlife species assessments.

Approach to receiving ATK: ATK is a significant gift given by the Creator. When it is shared, ATK should be treated with respect and integrity and used only for its intended purpose, in this case, for the benefit of that particular species. The receiver is expected to follow these guidelines when receiving gifts of knowledge and information from ATK holders.

Ecosystem Approach: ATK is typically interconnected and interrelated to information about multiple wildlife species, including humans, within the habitat, community or ecosystem. For this reason, and through the advice of Elders and ATK holders, the ATK Subcommittee supports an ecosystem approach that considers ways to incorporate this into the existing wildlife species assessment process.

The Eight Steps of the COSEWIC ATK Process and Protocols Guidelines

  1. Community approvals
  2. Ethics Review
  3. Completion of any Required Permits
  4. Acquisition of Participant’s Prior Informed Consent
  5. Interview with ATK Holder(s)
  6. Information Review with ATK Holder(s)
  7. Integration of ATK into species status report
  8. Post Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting Communication with ATK Holders

Guiding Principles of the COSEWIC ATK Process & Protocols Guidelines

The ATK Subcommittee is guided in carrying out its functions by the following principles. The ATK Subcommittee recommends that contractors also abide by these same principles.

  1. Subject to the terms of self-government and land claims agreements, Aboriginal communities are presumed to be the primary bodies to facilitate access to ATK in the assessment and classification of species at risk. Access is subject to local laws, protocols and practices.
  2. In order to use ATK in the assessment and classification of species at risk, permission must be secured from the ATK holders of such knowledge.
  3. ATK used in the assessment and classification of species at risk is to be treated as public knowledge only with the approval of the ATK holders of such knowledge. It is to be organized and presented in a culturally-appropriate, timely and thorough manner, and - to the extent possible - in such a way as to be comprehensible by both Aboriginal and non-aboriginal persons.
  4. ATK is to be given equal recognition and value with western Science and Community Knowledge.

The Development of the COSEWIC ATK Process and Protocol Guidelines

Working Group Members: from the ATK Subcommittee:

  • Norma Kassi (Lead)
  • Josephine Mandamin
  • Gabriel Nirlungayuk
  • Donna Hurlburt
  • Dan Benoit

With support from the COSEWIC Secretariat:

  • Gloria Goulet
  • Neil Jones
  1. The COSEWIC Secretariat was directed to prepare and distribute information from available sources to initiate discussion.
  2. The Process & Protocol Working Group met on August 2nd and September 8th, 2006, via teleconference, to prepare draft recommendations.
  3. The Draft ATK Process & Protocol Guidelines were approved by ATK Subcommittee members at their September 26 & 27, 2006 meeting in St. Andrews, NB.
  4. Facilitated workshops were held in 2008 and 2009 in which Aboriginal Elders and ATK holders reviewed the Draft ATK P&P Guidelines and provided advice and guidance. Their input has been included in versions of the draft.
    Elders / ATK Holder Workshops’ locations and dates include:
    • Ontario Elders Workshop, Thunder Bay, ON, February 2008;
    • West Elders Workshop, Edmonton, AB, March 2008;
    • East / Quebec Elders Workshop, Halifax, NS, October 2008;
    • North Elders Workshop, Rankin Inlet, NU, July 2009.
  5. The version of the Draft COSEWIC ATK Process and Protocol Guidelines required a review from Elders and ATK holders before implementation by COSEWIC and the COSEWIC ATK Subcommittee.
    • Elders Review Meeting, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, October 2009.

List of Appendices

The Eight Steps for the gathering and integration of ATK into the assessment of wildlife species by COSEWIC

Step #1 - Community Approvals

The approval process for conducting an ATK gathering project is hierarchical. Also, it requires information be provided to participants throughout.

  1. Produce a Project Information Sheet (print 2 sides, so result is a single sheet)
    • Purpose of the project (1/2 pg); (including a statement “Discussions on this species will not to be considered part of a Consultation process.” It will also include the date of the Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting)
    • the COSEWIC ATK principles (taken from this guidelines document) (1/2 pg);
    • the potential risks and benefits of participation for the community and/or ATK Holder(s) and the species (1/2 pg);
    • contact and follow up information ie. COSEWIC and SARA websites (1/2 pg)
  2. Produce a Legal Considerations Information Sheet(s) containing
    • methods for ensuring Aboriginal rights to Ownership and Control of their information and protection of ATK.
    • method for sharing of government information to the public via ATIP (Access to Information and Privacy). Therefore, only non-sensitive information should be provided to government representatives.
  3. Initially, heads of First Nations, Inuit and Métis nations or communities will be approached by members of the ATK Subcommittee (or the national Aboriginal TK holders network) providing the required information described above to seek approval to contact the relevant community group or member (such as an ATK Oversight Committee where established). The ATK Subcommittee can also ask whether there is any process and protocol guidelines or ethics review processes already in place. The ATK Subcommittee can also ask if there is a member of the community to act as a project liaison who could assist with identifying relevant ATK holders in the community. The liaison could also facilitate Aboriginal language translation when required.
  4. From ATK Subcommittee members and/or the COSEWIC Secretariat’s ATK Coordinator, the ATK project contractor will then be provided with the contact information along with basic knowledge such as the Aboriginal group’s cultural practices, language(s) and traditions. This information is needed to ensure they approach the ATK Holder in a respectful, culturally-appropriate manner, recognizing they are equal partners in the information sharing process.
  5. The contractor will contact the ATK oversight committee or relevant community group contact to seek approval for approaching the ATK Holder(s). If approved, the contractor will be provided with specific instructions for contacting and meeting with ATK Holder(s).

Step #2 - Ethics Review

Since ATK gathering projects involve human participants, an Ethics Review may be required. The review may be used to ensure research participants are treated respectfully, that their knowledge is appropriately recognized, and that the project adheres to the principles stated in the COSEWIC ATK Process and Protocols Guidelines.

The Ethics Review of the ATK gathering project may be launched automatically during the Stage #1 Approval Process where Aboriginal organizations or communities have the capacity, or by the COSEWIC ATK Subcommittee.

Step #3 – Completion of any Required Permits

The COSEWIC Secretariat’s ATK Coordinator and/or the ATK Subcommittee will assist the contractor to identify and apply for required ATK project / research permits to meet the requirements that may exist in provinces, territories, Wildlife Management Boards, Aboriginal organizations and communities.

Step #4 – Acquisition of the Participant’s Prior Informed Consent (PIC)

As part of the community approvals process described above, ATK holders will be asked to sign a PIC form. The form must include information required to make an informed decision on whether to participate in the ATK gathering project. The purpose of the project and all stages from interview to integration of their ATK into the species assessment process will be clearly described in plain language. ATK holders can request the PIC form be translated to their language. The PIC form is used to signify their understanding of the purpose of the project and how it may affect them and the species under consideration. However, signing the PIC form does not affect an ATK Holder’s right to withdraw their contribution from the project at any stage prior to the Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting where the species status will be assessed by COSEWIC. However, it is recommended to do by the date that is three months prior to the meeting. The date of that meeting, and the subsequent three months prior target date to revise or remove ATK, will be indicated on the Project Information Sheet.

Step #5 – Interview with the ATK Holder(s)

Interviews may be one-on-one or in a group setting. They may be conducted in a place where the ATK Holder(s) are most comfortable. This may be in their own home, a community building, a public location such as a coffee shop or when feasible out on the land. To aid in the discussion, contractors will provide maps and accurate photos of the species and ensure they are available during the interview. Particularly for group settings, biologists may be invited to visit the community and share information from related relevant research projects.

To address ATK Holder ownership, control and protection of ATK, the contractor will transcribe interview notes/tapes information as quickly as possible so that notes and records can be returned or destroyed as soon as possible.

The interview will also include questions to identify the ATK Holder’s experience and species expertise. Answers to such questions, along with community and ATK Subcommittee member recognition of the ATK holders expertise, will function as a verification process to ensure acceptability of the ATK by the contractor or ATK Subcommittee.

Step #6 - Information Review

Information Review with ATK Holder(s).

All original interview notes & tapes (audio and video) will remain in the community to avoid intentional and unintentional dissemination of raw data. The contractor will take only the relevant information and produce a summary for the ATK Holder(s) review and approval. The contractor will take only the approved summarized version of information that has been approved by the ATK Holder or community.

Sensitive information on the location of a species or its habitat may be important for COSEWIC assessments. If COSEWIC considers that restricting the release of the information would be in the best interest of the species, COSEWIC can advise the federal Minister of Environment and Climate Change to withhold such information in the published status report. (SARA s.124)

ATK holders will review and approve the summarized version of the ATK before it is included in the status report Biologists may be invited by the community to visit the community to review the collective information from the project. ATK holders have the right to refuse to give approval at any stage prior to the Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting where the species status will be assessed by COSEWIC. However, it is recommended to do so by the date that is three months prior to the meeting. The date of that meeting, and the subsequent three months prior target date to revise or remove ATK, will be indicated on the Project Information Sheet.

Step # 7 - Integration of ATK into species status report

Content of the ATK reviews will be integrated in the species status report by the status report writer. ATK content of Draft Status report is then reviewed by ATK Subcommittee and ATK review team during the review of the draft status report. Report writer then incorporates suggestions into the report in consultation with the SSC Co-chair.

Step #8 - Post Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting Communication with ATK Holders

Within one week of the end date of the Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting, an email, or letter when necessary, will be sent to all ATK holders who were involved in the ATK gathering for the species that were assessed at that Wildlife Species Assessment Meeting. Similar to media releases, this email or letter will indicate the decision made by COSEWIC regarding their recommendation of status.

About us

The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) is an independent advisory panel to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada that meets twice a year to assess the status of wildlife species at risk of extinction. Members are wildlife biology experts from academia, government, non-governmental organizations and the private sector responsible for designating wildlife species in danger of disappearing from Canada.

COSEWIC secretariat

Canadian Wildlife Service
Environment and Climate Change Canada
351 St. Joseph Blvd
Gatineau QC K1A 0H3

Email: cosewic-cosepac@ec.gc.ca